Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSURX vs FGNCX
CSURX vs FGNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSURX vs FGNCX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure R
Price$24.56
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$11.98
Change+$0.10 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets484.82M
CSURX vs FGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSURX vs. FGNCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSURX is a Hold and FGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSURX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. FGNCX (485M). CSURX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: CSURX (1.74) vs FGNCX (1.38). CSURX was incepted earlier than FGNCX: CSURX (11 years) vs FGNCX (17 years). FGNCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than CSURX (1.37). CSURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. FGNCX (83.00). CSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: CSURX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). CSURX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. FGNCX (9.04). CSURX return over 5 years is better than : 26.03 vs. FGNCX (18.43).
| CSURX | FGNCX | CSURX / FGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.96 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 2.09 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.821 | 1.268 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 987M | 485M | 204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.38 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 9.04 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.50 | 18.07 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.03 | 18.43 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.26 | 47.40 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement