Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUIX vs GRSIX
CSUIX vs GRSIX Comparison
Open Charts CSUIX vs GRSIX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure I
Price$24.48
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
Brookfield Next Generation Infras I
Price$9.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.04M
CSUIX vs GRSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUIX vs. GRSIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUIX is a Hold and GRSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUIX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. GRSIX (25M). CSUIX pays higher dividends than GRSIX: CSUIX (2.28) vs GRSIX (1.83). CSUIX was incepted earlier than GRSIX: CSUIX (22 years) vs GRSIX (4 years). GRSIX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CSUIX (0.87). CSUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. GRSIX (69.00). CSUIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRSIX: CSUIX (100000) vs GRSIX (1000000). CSUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. GRSIX (10.39).
| CSUIX | GRSIX | CSUIX / GRSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.00 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.39 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.824 | 1.715 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 987M | 25M | 3,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 1.83 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 10.39 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.17 | 0.21 | 7,565% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.08 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.72 | -57.86 | -171% |