Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUIX vs FGNCX
CSUIX vs FGNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSUIX vs FGNCX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure I
Price$24.48
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
Nuveen Global Infrastructure C
Price$11.98
Change+$0.10 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets484.82M
CSUIX vs FGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUIX vs. FGNCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUIX is a Hold and FGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUIX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. FGNCX (485M). CSUIX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: CSUIX (2.28) vs FGNCX (1.38). CSUIX was incepted earlier than FGNCX: CSUIX (22 years) vs FGNCX (17 years). FGNCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than CSUIX (0.87). CSUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. FGNCX (83.00). FGNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSUIX: FGNCX (2500) vs CSUIX (100000). CSUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. FGNCX (9.04). CSUIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. FGNCX (18.43).
| CSUIX | FGNCX | CSUIX / FGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.96 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.09 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.824 | 1.268 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 987M | 485M | 204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 1.38 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 9.04 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.17 | 18.07 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.08 | 18.43 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.72 | 47.40 | 208% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement