Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUIX vs ECOAX
CSUIX vs ECOAX Comparison
Open Charts CSUIX vs ECOAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure I
Price$25.59
Change+$0.26 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
Redwheel Next Generation Power Infras A
Price$11.04
Change-$0.21 (-1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.45M
CSUIX vs ECOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUIX vs. ECOAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUIX is a Hold and ECOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUIX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. ECOAX (224M). ECOAX pays higher dividends than CSUIX: ECOAX (3.61) vs CSUIX (2.20). CSUIX was incepted earlier than ECOAX: CSUIX (22 years) vs ECOAX (5 years). ECOAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CSUIX (0.87). CSUIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. ECOAX (47.00). ECOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSUIX: ECOAX (2500) vs CSUIX (100000). ECOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.35 vs. CSUIX (13.82). CSUIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.92 vs. ECOAX (-4.22).
| CSUIX | ECOAX | CSUIX / ECOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.395 | 4.151 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 987M | 224M | 441% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 3.61 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.82 | 33.35 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.67 | 11.63 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.92 | -4.22 | -804% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers