Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$24.16
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.28M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets350.3M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. RGFTX (350M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (2.65) vs CSUCX (1.45). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.02 vs. CSUCX (6.49). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.90 vs. RGFTX (25.45).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.427 | 15.472 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 350M | 264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 2.65 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 18.02 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.61 | 26.96 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.90 | 25.45 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement