Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$24.39
Change+$0.14 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets986.79M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets417.93M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 987M vs. RGFTX (418M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.27) vs CSUCX (1.29). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.93 vs. CSUCX (9.87). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.80 vs. RGFTX (17.13).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.827 | 0.304 | 272% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 987M | 418M | 236% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 3.27 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 13.93 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.74 | 23.71 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.80 | 17.13 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement