Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$24.25
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets416.23M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. RGFTX (416M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (2.91) vs CSUCX (1.35). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. CSUCX (6.31). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.64 vs. RGFTX (18.83).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.823 | 12.270 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 416M | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 2.91 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 11.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.70 | 27.54 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.64 | 18.83 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement