Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$23.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.11M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.19
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets348.62M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. RGFTX (349M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (2.65) vs CSUCX (1.45). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. CSUCX (9.23). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.54 vs. RGFTX (26.13).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.326 | 14.684 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 349M | 265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 2.65 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 19.88 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.51 | 25.52 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.54 | 26.13 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement