Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$25.42
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.84M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.22M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. RGFTX (355M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.01) vs CSUCX (1.40). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.27 vs. CSUCX (4.82). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.37 vs. RGFTX (20.81).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.977 | 20.524 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 355M | 274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 3.01 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.82 | 15.27 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.19 | 35.31 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.37 | 20.81 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement