CSUAY
Price
$18.00
Change
+$0.43 (+2.45%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
75.88B
MOAEF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
17.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSUAY vs MOAEF

Header iconCSUAY vs MOAEF Comparison
Open Charts CSUAY vs MOAEFBanner chart's image
China Shenhua Energy
Price$18.00
Change+$0.43 (+2.45%)
Volume$3.76K
Capitalization75.88B
Mongolia Energy
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$419
Capitalization17.37M
CSUAY vs MOAEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSUAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSUAY vs. MOAEF commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAY is a StrongBuy and MOAEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CSUAY: $18.00 vs. MOAEF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CSUAY and MOAEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSUAY: 43% vs. MOAEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSUAY: $75.88B vs. MOAEF: $17.37M
CSUAY [@Coal] is valued at $75.88B. MOAEF’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $17.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSUAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMOAEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSUAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MOAEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSUAY is a better buy in the long-term than MOAEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSUAY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSUAY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CSUAY (@Coal) experienced а +5.82% price change this week, while MOAEF (@Coal) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (+0.96% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAY($75.9B) has a higher market cap than MOAEF($17.4M). CSUAY has higher P/E ratio than MOAEF: CSUAY (6.08) vs MOAEF (0.12). CSUAY YTD gains are higher at: 5.018 vs. MOAEF (0.000). CSUAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.8B vs. MOAEF (-770.25M). CSUAY has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. MOAEF (112M). MOAEF has less debt than CSUAY: MOAEF (5.97B) vs CSUAY (55.2B). CSUAY has higher revenues than MOAEF: CSUAY (348B) vs MOAEF (2.91B).
CSUAYMOAEFCSUAY / MOAEF
Capitalization75.9B17.4M436,207%
EBITDA96.8B-770.25M-12,567%
Gain YTD5.0180.000-
P/E Ratio6.080.125,060%
Revenue348B2.91B11,979%
Total Cash186B112M166,071%
Total Debt55.2B5.97B925%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSUAY vs MOAEF: Fundamental Ratings
CSUAY
MOAEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
894
SMR RATING
1..100
59100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6259
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSUAY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as MOAEF (48). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew similarly to MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.

CSUAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MOAEF (94). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew significantly faster than MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.

CSUAY's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOAEF (100). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.

CSUAY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MOAEF (56). This means that CSUAY’s stock grew similarly to MOAEF’s over the last 12 months.

MOAEF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CSUAY (62). This means that MOAEF’s stock grew similarly to CSUAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSUAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSUAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCEBX9.750.06
+0.62%
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income A
VGLSX10.450.05
+0.48%
VALIC Company I Global Strategy
PJERX14.760.03
+0.20%
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income R
PGINX24.49N/A
N/A
Impax Global Environmental Markets Instl
FASMX21.25N/A
N/A
Fidelity Asset Manager 50%

CSUAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSUAY has been loosely correlated with YZCAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSUAY jumps, then YZCAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSUAY
1D Price
Change %
CSUAY100%
+2.45%
YZCAY - CSUAY
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
ARCH - CSUAY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCC - CSUAY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
BTU - CSUAY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
AMR - CSUAY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More

MOAEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MOAEF and PTIZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MOAEF and PTIZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOAEF
1D Price
Change %
MOAEF100%
N/A
PTIZF - MOAEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOGLF - MOAEF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITAYY - MOAEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
CSUAY - MOAEF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
NHPEF - MOAEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More