Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$25.32
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.35M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.59
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.51M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. RGFTX (354M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.06) vs CSUAX (1.99). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. CSUAX (2.11). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. RGFTX (28.84).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.976 | 19.732 | 61% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 994M | 354M | 281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 3.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.11 | 12.05 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.12 | 47.00 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | 28.84 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement