Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$23.91
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.11M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.19
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets348.62M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. RGFTX (349M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (2.65) vs CSUAX (2.09). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. CSUAX (9.99). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.91 vs. RGFTX (26.13).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.741 | 14.684 | 39% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 349M | 265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 2.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 19.88 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | 25.52 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.91 | 26.13 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement