Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.01
Change-$0.16 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.44M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.04M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. RGFTX (346M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.12) vs CSUAX (2.05). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. CSUAX (-0.33). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.37 vs. RGFTX (24.70).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.891 | 15.922 | 43% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 935M | 346M | 270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 3.12 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.33 | 11.65 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.59 | 27.31 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.37 | 24.70 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement