Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets416.23M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. RGFTX (416M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (2.91) vs CSUAX (1.94). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. CSUAX (6.64). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.35 vs. RGFTX (18.83).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.200 | 12.270 | 59% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 416M | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 11.53 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.60 | 27.54 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.35 | 18.83 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement