Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$25.47
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.84M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.22M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. RGFTX (355M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.01) vs CSUAX (2.01). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.27 vs. CSUAX (5.50). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.59 vs. RGFTX (20.81).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.640 | 20.524 | 62% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 355M | 274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 3.01 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 15.27 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.56 | 35.31 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.59 | 20.81 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement