Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.44M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.3M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a StrongBuy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. RGFTX (352M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.17) vs CSUAX (2.08). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.19 vs. CSUAX (5.10). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.34 vs. RGFTX (24.86).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.439 | 17.723 | 48% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 935M | 352M | 266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 3.17 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 17.19 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.64 | 21.48 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.34 | 24.86 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.90 | N/A | - |