Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$25.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.84M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.62
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.08M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a StrongBuy and RGFTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. RGFTX (353M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (2.91) vs CSUAX (1.94). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. CSUAX (3.90). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.25 vs. RGFTX (19.82).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.551 | 20.637 | 61% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 353M | 275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 13.01 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.56 | 31.43 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.25 | 19.82 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement