Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.61
Change-$0.14 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.11M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.27
Change-$0.07 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.72M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 924M vs. RGFTX (352M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (2.69) vs CSUAX (1.87). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.76 vs. CSUAX (12.09). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.33 vs. RGFTX (26.75).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.420 | 13.974 | 53% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 924M | 352M | 263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 2.69 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | 19.76 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.12 | 28.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.33 | 26.75 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement