CSTUF
Price
$11.48
Change
+$0.06 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MANDF
Price
$6.38
Change
+$0.75 (+13.32%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSTUF vs MANDF

Header iconCSTUF vs MANDF Comparison
Open Charts CSTUF vs MANDFBanner chart's image
Constellation Acquisition Corp I
Price$11.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.53%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
MANDATUM OYJ
Price$6.38
Change+$0.75 (+13.32%)
Volume$700
Capitalization3.33B
CSTUF vs MANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSTUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSTUF vs. MANDF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTUF is a Hold and MANDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CSTUF: $11.48 vs. MANDF: $6.38)
Brand notoriety: CSTUF and MANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSTUF: 28% vs. MANDF: 90%
Market capitalization -- CSTUF: $0 vs. MANDF: $3.33B
CSTUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. MANDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $3.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSTUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMANDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSTUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MANDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the long-term than CSTUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSTUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSTUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MANDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MANDF is a better buy in the short-term than CSTUF.

Price Growth

CSTUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MANDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +13.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.82% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANDF YTD gains are higher at: 41.778 vs. CSTUF (0.702).
CSTUFMANDFCSTUF / MANDF
CapitalizationN/A3.33B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.70241.7782%
P/E RatioN/A15.44-
RevenueN/A893M-
Total CashN/A830M-
Total DebtN/A600M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSTUFMANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSTUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYCU0.36N/A
+1.04%
Cycurion Inc.
BNL16.340.03
+0.18%
Broadstone Net Lease
CBOE231.370.02
+0.01%
Cboe Global Markets
MERC3.72-0.01
-0.27%
Mercer International
FINW15.67-0.05
-0.32%
FinWise Bancorp

CSTUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSTUF and PORT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSTUF and PORT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTUF
1D Price
Change %
CSTUF100%
N/A
PORT - CSTUF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCAF - CSTUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
MANDF - CSTUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETAU - CSTUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - CSTUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MANDF and TLGYF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MANDF and TLGYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANDF
1D Price
Change %
MANDF100%
N/A
TLGYF - MANDF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - MANDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
BOWN - MANDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
RTGC - MANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVAC - MANDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
More