CSTL
Price
$22.71
Change
-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
658.78M
43 days until earnings call
CYBQF
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.01 (+0.78%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
267.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSTL vs CYBQF

Header iconCSTL vs CYBQF Comparison
Open Charts CSTL vs CYBQFBanner chart's image
Castle Biosciences
Price$22.71
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Volume$163.25K
Capitalization658.78M
Cyberdyne
Price$1.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.78%)
Volume$142
Capitalization267.68M
CSTL vs CYBQF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSTL vs. CYBQF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTL is a Buy and CYBQF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CSTL: $22.71 vs. CYBQF: $1.30)
Brand notoriety: CSTL and CYBQF are both not notable
CSTL represents the Medical Specialties, while CYBQF is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSTL: 30% vs. CYBQF: 99%
Market capitalization -- CSTL: $658.78M vs. CYBQF: $267.68M
CSTL [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $658.78M. CYBQF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $267.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $232.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $10.5B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSTL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCYBQF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSTL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CYBQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSTL is a better buy in the long-term than CYBQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSTL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYBQF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSTL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CYBQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYBQF is a better buy in the short-term than CSTL.

Price Growth

CSTL (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -6.96% price change this week, while CYBQF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.99%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSTL is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.53% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.97% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSTL($659M) has a higher market cap than CYBQF($268M). CYBQF YTD gains are higher at: 25.604 vs. CSTL (-14.784). CYBQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 73M vs. CSTL (32.6M). CYBQF has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. CSTL (276M). CSTL has less debt than CYBQF: CSTL (37.4M) vs CYBQF (536M). CYBQF has higher revenues than CSTL: CYBQF (4.39B) vs CSTL (346M).
CSTLCYBQFCSTL / CYBQF
Capitalization659M268M246%
EBITDA32.6M73M45%
Gain YTD-14.78425.604-58%
P/E Ratio30.24N/A-
Revenue346M4.39B8%
Total Cash276M15.6B2%
Total Debt37.4M536M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSTL vs CYBQF: Fundamental Ratings
CSTL
CYBQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSTL's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYBQF (99). This means that CSTL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CSTL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (100). This means that CSTL’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CSTL's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (95). This means that CSTL’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CSTL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (55). This means that CSTL’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

CSTL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CYBQF (100). This means that CSTL’s stock grew similarly to CYBQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSTLCYBQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIHHX7.180.09
+1.27%
Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity I-2
TCGRX31.600.27
+0.86%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R4
MTRBX20.240.13
+0.65%
MFS Total Return B
BIEAX26.730.14
+0.53%
Brandes International Equity A
AVEEX14.47-0.10
-0.69%
Avantis® Emerging Markets Equity Instl

CSTL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSTL has been loosely correlated with IMTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSTL jumps, then IMTH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTL
1D Price
Change %
CSTL100%
-0.13%
IMTH - CSTL
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTRA - CSTL
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
FLGT - CSTL
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
GH - CSTL
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
TCMD - CSTL
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More

CYBQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYBQF and CSTL have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYBQF and CSTL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYBQF
1D Price
Change %
CYBQF100%
N/A
CSTL - CYBQF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
CYBQY - CYBQF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
CNVVF - CYBQF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNVVY - CYBQF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
CHEOY - CYBQF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More