CSTE vs GMS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTE is a Hold and GMS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSTE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CSTE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSTE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSTE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GMS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSTE (@Building Products) experienced а -6.34% price change this week, while GMS (@Building Products) price change was +0.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSTE is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
GMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-1.70% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| CSTE | GMS | CSTE / GMS | |
| Capitalization | 144M | 3.88B | 4% |
| EBITDA | -51.62M | 593M | -9% |
| Gain YTD | 6.684 | 21.000 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.80 | 13.67 | 94% |
| Revenue | 565M | 5.39B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 91.1M | 88.3M | 103% |
| Total Debt | 146M | 1.23B | 12% |
CSTE | GMS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSTE's Valuation (2) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMS (63) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CSTE’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSTE (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than CSTE’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's SMR Rating (43) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSTE (96) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSTE’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSTE (83) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSTE’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSTE (93) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than CSTE’s over the last 12 months.
| CSTE | GMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
CSTE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSTE has been loosely correlated with UPNRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSTE jumps, then UPNRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSTE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSTE | 100% | +3.10% | ||
| UPNRF - CSTE | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| JBI - CSTE | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| GMS - CSTE | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| AZEK - CSTE | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| ROCK - CSTE | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||
GMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMS | 100% | -1.56% | ||
| BLDR - GMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ROCK - GMS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| AZEK - GMS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| TREX - GMS | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| JELD - GMS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||