Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs WCMJX
CSSZX vs WCMJX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs WCMJX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$23.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets379.22M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
Price$3.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.11M
CSSZX vs WCMJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. WCMJX commentary
Dec 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Buy and WCMJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSZX has more cash in the bank: 379M vs. WCMJX (3.11M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than WCMJX: CSSZX (0.61) vs WCMJX (0.00). CSSZX was incepted earlier than WCMJX: CSSZX (15 years) vs WCMJX (6 years). WCMJX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.04). CSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. WCMJX (15.00). WCMJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSZX: WCMJX (1000) vs CSSZX (2000). CSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.90 vs. WCMJX (-76.96). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 11.55 vs. WCMJX (-66.86).
| CSSZX | WCMJX | CSSZX / WCMJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.15 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.70 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.646 | -71.307 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 3.11M | 12,206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.90 | -76.96 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.80 | -67.37 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.55 | -66.86 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement