Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs WCMFX
CSSZX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs WCMFX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$21.51
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61M
CSSZX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Hold and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSZX has more cash in the bank: 373M vs. WCMFX (1.61M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: CSSZX (0.61) vs WCMFX (0.00). CSSZX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: CSSZX (15 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.04). CSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: CSSZX (2000) vs WCMFX (100000). CSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.83 vs. WCMFX (-70.39). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 6.54 vs. WCMFX (-65.45).
| CSSZX | WCMFX | CSSZX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.90 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.45 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.921 | -69.866 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 373M | 1.61M | 23,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.83 | -70.39 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.09 | -63.72 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | -65.45 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers