Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs SSGSX
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$23.12
Change+$0.34 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets390.36M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. CSSZX (390M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: CSSZX (0.62) vs SSGSX (0.47). CSSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: CSSZX (15 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.05). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSSZX (20.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: CSSZX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. CSSZX (-4.25). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 32.15 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| CSSZX | SSGSX | CSSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.172 | 2.046 | 302% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 390M | 5.64B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.47 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.25 | -1.56 | 272% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.83 | 3.97 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.15 | 22.95 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.80 | 24.71 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement