Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs SSGSX
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$21.51
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. CSSZX (373M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: CSSZX (0.61) vs SSGSX (0.48). CSSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: CSSZX (15 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.04). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. CSSZX (20.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: CSSZX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). CSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.83 vs. SSGSX (-2.42). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 6.54 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| CSSZX | SSGSX | CSSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.23 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.23 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.921 | -1.723 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 373M | 5.13B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.48 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.83 | -2.42 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.09 | 0.45 | 901% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | -0.63 | -1,030% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.63 | 18.71 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers