Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs SSGSX
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$22.40
Change+$0.13 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets385.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. CSSZX (386M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: CSSZX (0.85) vs SSGSX (0.61). CSSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: CSSZX (15 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.04). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. CSSZX (20.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: CSSZX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). CSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.38 vs. SSGSX (1.49). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 4.37 vs. SSGSX (-3.16).
| CSSZX | SSGSX | CSSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.23 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.23 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.111 | 5.281 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 386M | 5.04B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.61 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 1.49 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.88 | -1.36 | -212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.37 | -3.16 | -138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.56 | 50.55 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement