Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSVX vs NRGSX
CSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSVX vs NRGSX
Carillon Chartwell Small Cap R-6
Price$31.93
Change-$1.45 (-4.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets236.24M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.95
Change-$0.68 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.43B
CSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSVX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSVX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.43B vs. CSSVX (236M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CSSVX: NRGSX (0.07) vs CSSVX (0.00). CSSVX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CSSVX (8 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CSSVX (0.85) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). CSSVX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.66 vs. NRGSX (-14.42). CSSVX return over 5 years is better than : -4.72 vs. NRGSX (-7.58).
| CSSVX | NRGSX | CSSVX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.981 | -5.203 | -153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 8.43B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.66 | -14.42 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.45 | -2.02 | -1,012% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.72 | -7.58 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers