Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs TIRGX
CSSPX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.88M
CSSPX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TIRGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and TIRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. TIRGX (64.9M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSSPX (2.72) vs TIRGX (2.41). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSSPX (29 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSSPX (100000) vs TIRGX (500000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.28 vs. TIRGX (5.09). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 17.24 vs. TIRGX (5.02).
| CSSPX | TIRGX | CSSPX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.73 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.21 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.856 | 5.894 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 64.9M | 3,260% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 2.41 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.28 | 5.09 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.94 | 20.31 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.24 | 5.02 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement