Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs SWASX
CSSPX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.94M
CSSPX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. SWASX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. SWASX (285M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: SWASX (3.30) vs CSSPX (2.83). CSSPX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSSPX (28 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSSPX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.71). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). SWASX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: SWASX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.20 vs. CSSPX (11.37). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. SWASX (20.30).
| CSSPX | SWASX | CSSPX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.71 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.71 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.577 | 7.471 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 285M | 700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 3.30 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 12.20 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | 10.38 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.27 | 20.30 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.23 | 34.39 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement