Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs NRFNX
CSSPX vs NRFNX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs NRFNX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$55.92
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N
Price$11.69
Change+$0.26 (+2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.63M
CSSPX vs NRFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. NRFNX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and NRFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. NRFNX (34.6M). NRFNX (3.45) and CSSPX (3.36) have matching dividends . CSSPX was incepted earlier than NRFNX: CSSPX (29 years) vs NRFNX (13 years). NRFNX (1.61) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). NRFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). CSSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRFNX: CSSPX (100000) vs NRFNX (1000000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. NRFNX (10.98). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 18.98 vs. NRFNX (17.65).
| CSSPX | NRFNX | CSSPX / NRFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.85 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.61 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.530 | 3.269 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 34.6M | 5,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 10.98 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.40 | 17.16 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.98 | 17.65 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.37 | 3.69 | 1,717% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement