Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs NRFAX
CSSPX vs NRFAX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs NRFAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.64
Change-$0.14 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate A
Price$12.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.89M
CSSPX vs NRFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. NRFAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and NRFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. NRFAX (34.9M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than NRFAX: CSSPX (2.83) vs NRFAX (2.51). CSSPX was incepted earlier than NRFAX: CSSPX (28 years) vs NRFAX (25 years). NRFAX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). NRFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). NRFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: NRFAX (2500) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. NRFAX (6.74). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 35.81 vs. NRFAX (24.99).
| CSSPX | NRFAX | CSSPX / NRFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.15 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.01 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.776 | 5.279 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 34.9M | 5,751% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.51 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.04 | 6.74 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.22 | 10.70 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.81 | 24.99 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.16 | -8.43 | -571% |