Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs IRFIX
CSSPX vs IRFIX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs IRFIX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.64
Change+$0.66 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Cohen & Steers International Realty I
Price$9.04
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.95M
CSSPX vs IRFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. IRFIX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and IRFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. IRFIX (262M). IRFIX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: IRFIX (3.02) vs CSSPX (2.83). CSSPX was incepted earlier than IRFIX: CSSPX (28 years) vs IRFIX (20 years). IRFIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). IRFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). CSSPX (100000) and IRFIX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. IRFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. CSSPX (6.80). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 31.11 vs. IRFIX (2.52).
| CSSPX | IRFIX | CSSPX / IRFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.00 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.22 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.776 | 16.899 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 262M | 766% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 3.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 7.33 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.70 | -2.39 | -238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.11 | 2.52 | 1,237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.17 | 23.82 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement