Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs DGBCX
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$55.92
Change+$1.08 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.87
Change+$0.23 (+2.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.96M
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. DGBCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. DGBCX (311M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSSPX (3.36) vs DGBCX (1.14). CSSPX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSSPX (29 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (39.68). DGBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: DGBCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. DGBCX (10.52). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 18.98 vs. DGBCX (7.62).
| CSSPX | DGBCX | CSSPX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.530 | 3.020 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 311M | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 1.14 | 294% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 10.52 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.40 | 14.77 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.98 | 7.62 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.37 | 25.44 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement