Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs DGBCX
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.68
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets310.29M
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. DGBCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.12B vs. DGBCX (310M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSSPX (2.72) vs DGBCX (1.57). CSSPX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSSPX (29 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). DGBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: DGBCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX (8.28) and DGBCX (8.02) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 17.24 vs. DGBCX (7.53).
| CSSPX | DGBCX | CSSPX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.856 | 8.561 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 310M | 683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 1.57 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.28 | 8.02 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.94 | 24.11 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.24 | 7.53 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.15 | 14.00 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers