Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSCX vs SSGSX
CSSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSCX vs SSGSX
Columbia Small Cap Value Discv C
Price$18.24
Change-$0.13 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.06
Change-$2.54 (-5.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.99B
CSSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.99B vs. CSSCX (1.93B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than CSSCX: SSGSX (0.48) vs CSSCX (0.32). CSSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: CSSCX (30 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). CSSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). CSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). CSSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: CSSCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.83 vs. CSSCX (-17.56). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 6.40 vs. CSSCX (-24.14).
| CSSCX | SSGSX | CSSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.23 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.352 | 4.674 | -264% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 4.99B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.48 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.56 | -8.83 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.71 | -1.03 | 1,326% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.14 | 6.40 | -377% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.33 | 29.48 | -103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers