Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs SCWFX
CSQCX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs SCWFX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.96M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$73.40
Change-$0.16 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
CSQCX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. SCWFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. CSQCX (21M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: CSQCX (0.89) vs SCWFX (0.53). CSQCX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: CSQCX (24 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SCWFX (32.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: SCWFX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. CSQCX (-8.49). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.97 vs. CSQCX (-13.34).
| CSQCX | SCWFX | CSQCX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.08 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.08 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.972 | 10.766 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21M | 80.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.53 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.49 | 6.34 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.00 | 40.74 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.34 | 7.97 | -167% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.93 | 61.07 | -54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement