Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSLDX
CSQCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSLDX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.96M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$75.57
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
CSQCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. CSQCX (21M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: CSQCX (0.89) vs RSLDX (0.78). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: CSQCX (24 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSLDX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. CSQCX (-8.49). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : 9.52 vs. CSQCX (-13.34).
| CSQCX | RSLDX | CSQCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.80 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 0.80 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.972 | 11.021 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21M | 80.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.78 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.49 | 6.64 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.00 | 41.66 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.34 | 9.52 | -140% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement