Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSLDX
CSQCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSLDX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.53M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$75.48
Change+$0.27 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
CSQCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. CSQCX (21.5M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: CSQCX (0.87) vs RSLDX (0.79). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: CSQCX (24 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSLDX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. CSQCX (-8.11). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : 17.67 vs. CSQCX (-6.11).
| CSQCX | RSLDX | CSQCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.80 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 0.80 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.376 | 10.889 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.79 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | 6.02 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.34 | 46.20 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.11 | 17.67 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement