Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSLBX
CSQCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSLBX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$7.80
Change-$1.59 (-16.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.81M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
CSQCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a StrongBuy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. CSQCX (18.8M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: CSQCX (1.79) vs RSLBX (0.19). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: CSQCX (24 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.74). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RSLBX (41.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSLBX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. CSQCX (-15.60). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : -12.64 vs. CSQCX (-35.79).
| CSQCX | RSLBX | CSQCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.74 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.74 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.902 | 4.706 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.19 | 930% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.60 | 11.64 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.30 | 20.82 | -69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.79 | -12.64 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.06 | 82.58 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement