Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSLBX
CSQCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSLBX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.96M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
CSQCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. CSQCX (21M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: CSQCX (0.89) vs RSLBX (0.06). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: CSQCX (24 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSLBX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. CSQCX (-8.49). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.75 vs. CSQCX (-13.34).
| CSQCX | RSLBX | CSQCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.75 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.75 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.972 | 10.182 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21M | 80.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.06 | 1,580% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.49 | 5.63 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.00 | 37.92 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.34 | 2.75 | -485% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.93 | 45.45 | -72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement