Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSEBX
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSEBX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.17
Change-$0.10 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.51
Change+$0.16 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.6B
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. CSQCX (20.1M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: CSQCX (0.91) vs RSEBX (0.22). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: CSQCX (24 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSEBX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. CSQCX (-9.62). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 4.76 vs. CSQCX (-17.41).
| CSQCX | RSEBX | CSQCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.45 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.45 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.108 | 11.542 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.22 | 405% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.62 | 7.02 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.21 | 29.26 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.41 | 4.76 | -365% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.79 | 58.21 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement