Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSEBX
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSEBX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.29
Change+$0.07 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.86M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.96
Change-$0.20 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.25B
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 83.3B vs. CSQCX (19.9M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: CSQCX (0.90) vs RSEBX (0.22). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: CSQCX (24 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSEBX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. CSQCX (-11.79). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.00 vs. CSQCX (-20.07).
| CSQCX | RSEBX | CSQCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.45 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.45 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.216 | 12.542 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 83.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.22 | 410% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.79 | 6.14 | -192% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.14 | 28.70 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.07 | 0.00 | -9,162,522% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.15 | 55.74 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement