Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPFX vs HGXIX
CSPFX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPFX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529F
Price$70.33
Change-$1.12 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.47B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.47
Change-$0.16 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.36M
CSPFX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPFX vs. HGXIX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPFX is a StrongBuy and HGXIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. HGXIX (281M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPFX: HGXIX (0.92) vs CSPFX (0.73). CSPFX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPFX (23 years) vs HGXIX (8 years). CSPFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPFX (32.00). CSPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPFX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. CSPFX (4.93). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 58.09 vs. CSPFX (23.11).
| CSPFX | HGXIX | CSPFX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.87 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.87 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.475 | 7.087 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 281M | 26,868% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.92 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 12.28 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.67 | 39.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.11 | 58.09 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement