Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPFX vs HGXIX
CSPFX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPFX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529F
Price$75.99
Change+$0.55 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.36
Change+$0.14 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.17M
CSPFX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPFX vs. HGXIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPFX is a StrongBuy and HGXIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPFX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. HGXIX (323M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPFX: HGXIX (0.87) vs CSPFX (0.70). CSPFX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPFX (23 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). CSPFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPFX (32.00). CSPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPFX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX (13.00) and CSPFX (12.49) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.02 vs. CSPFX (18.93).
| CSPFX | HGXIX | CSPFX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.87 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.87 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.802 | 13.524 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 323M | 25,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 13.00 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 41.93 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 44.02 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement