Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPFX vs HGXFX
CSPFX vs HGXFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPFX vs HGXFX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529F
Price$75.99
Change+$0.55 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$17.44
Change+$0.09 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.17M
CSPFX vs HGXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPFX vs. HGXFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPFX is a StrongBuy and HGXFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPFX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. HGXFX (323M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than CSPFX: HGXFX (1.05) vs CSPFX (0.70). CSPFX was incepted earlier than HGXFX: CSPFX (23 years) vs HGXFX (9 years). CSPFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.75). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPFX (32.00). CSPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: CSPFX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.18 vs. CSPFX (12.49). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. CSPFX (18.93).
| CSPFX | HGXFX | CSPFX / HGXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.69 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.75 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.802 | 13.616 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 323M | 25,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.05 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 13.18 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.40 | 42.62 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 45.02 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement