Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPFX vs HGXCX
CSPFX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPFX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529F
Price$70.33
Change-$1.12 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.47B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$15.92
Change-$0.16 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.36M
CSPFX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPFX vs. HGXCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPFX is a StrongBuy and HGXCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. HGXCX (281M). CSPFX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: CSPFX (0.73) vs HGXCX (0.00). CSPFX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: CSPFX (23 years) vs HGXCX (8 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than CSPFX (1.14). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPFX (32.00). CSPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: CSPFX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. CSPFX (4.93). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.76 vs. CSPFX (23.11).
| CSPFX | HGXCX | CSPFX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.94 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.99 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.475 | 6.488 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.5B | 281M | 26,868% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 11.56 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.67 | 34.80 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.11 | 50.76 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement