Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSCX
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.79
Change-$0.11 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.06M
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and RGSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. RGSCX (44.1M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSCX (1.46) vs CSPAX (0.58). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSCX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. RGSCX (-6.27). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.95 vs. RGSCX (-23.89).
| CSPAX | RGSCX | CSPAX / RGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.650 | 6.205 | 156% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3B | 44.1M | 182,086% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.46 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | -6.27 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 9.05 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.95 | -23.89 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.82 | -40.59 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement