Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSCX
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.91
Change+$0.13 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.91M
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and RGSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. RGSCX (43.9M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSCX (1.45) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSCX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. RGSCX (-7.10). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.56 vs. RGSCX (-22.80).
| CSPAX | RGSCX | CSPAX / RGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.673 | 6.741 | 173% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 43.9M | 185,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | -7.10 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.70 | 19.65 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | -22.80 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.97 | -37.07 | -164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement