Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSCX
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.79M
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and RGSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. RGSCX (40.8M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSCX (1.49) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSCX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (25.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. RGSCX (-15.48). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.04 vs. RGSCX (-33.30).
| CSPAX | RGSCX | CSPAX / RGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.797 | 0.759 | 1,423% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.9B | 40.8M | 198,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.49 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | -15.48 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 18.07 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | -33.30 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.47 | -41.03 | -150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement