Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXRX
CSPAX vs HGXRX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXRX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.81
Change-$1.33 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.78B
Hartford Global Impact R3
Price$16.42
Change-$0.25 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.46M
CSPAX vs HGXRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.8B vs. HGXRX (323M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXRX: CSPAX (0.55) vs HGXRX (0.41). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXRX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXRX (9 years). HGXRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). HGXRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). HGXRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: HGXRX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. HGXRX (6.45). HGXRX return over 5 years is better than : 21.68 vs. CSPAX (7.02).
| CSPAX | HGXRX | CSPAX / HGXRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.41 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.46 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.914 | 9.816 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.8B | 323M | 25,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.41 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 6.45 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.79 | 28.25 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.02 | 21.68 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers