Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75M
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. HGXIX (310M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXIX (0.90) vs CSPAX (0.58). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXIX (8 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. CSPAX (10.22). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.20 vs. CSPAX (14.95).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.650 | 11.573 | 83% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3B | 310M | 25,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.90 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 12.80 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 27.12 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.95 | 41.20 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers