Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.03
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.88M
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXIX (326M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXIX (0.89) vs CSPAX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX (9.16) and CSPAX (9.03) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.54 vs. CSPAX (-5.80).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.87 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.87 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.314 | 10.858 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.3B | 326M | 25,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.89 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 9.16 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.42 | 36.86 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.80 | 14.54 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers