Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.81
Change-$1.33 (-1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.78B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.72
Change-$0.25 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.46M
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.8B vs. HGXIX (323M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXIX (0.89) vs CSPAX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.56 vs. HGXIX (5.97). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.54 vs. CSPAX (5.10).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.907 | 8.713 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.8B | 323M | 25,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.89 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 5.97 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.85 | 29.85 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.10 | 22.54 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers