Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.15
Change+$0.53 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.4M
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and HGXIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXIX (321M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXIX (0.89) vs CSPAX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. HGXIX (4.32). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.84 vs. CSPAX (1.72).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.439 | 9.298 | 145% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.3B | 321M | 25,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.89 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 4.32 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.79 | 28.03 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.72 | 17.84 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers