Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.36
Change+$0.14 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.17M
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and HGXIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. HGXIX (323M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXIX (0.87) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.00 vs. CSPAX (12.31). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.02 vs. CSPAX (17.56).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.673 | 13.524 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 323M | 25,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.87 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 13.00 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.70 | 41.93 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | 44.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement