Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.85M
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. HGXCX (327M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: CSPAX (0.56) vs HGXCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXCX (9 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX (6.52) and CSPAX (6.37) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.08 vs. CSPAX (8.04).
| CSPAX | HGXCX | CSPAX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.94 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.99 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.797 | 11.438 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.9B | 327M | 24,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 6.52 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 40.47 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | 25.08 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers