Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.44
Change+$1.43 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$17.09
Change+$0.29 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.46M
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. HGXCX (339M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: CSPAX (0.67) vs HGXCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXCX (9 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. HGXCX (36.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.19 vs. HGXCX (9.20). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.51 vs. CSPAX (-7.69).
| CSPAX | HGXCX | CSPAX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.99 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.763 | 5.494 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4B | 339M | 24,307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.19 | 9.20 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 26.87 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.69 | 8.51 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers