Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.03
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.47M
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. HGXCX (326M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: CSPAX (0.55) vs HGXCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXCX (9 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.65 vs. HGXCX (8.04). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.27 vs. CSPAX (-5.87).
| CSPAX | HGXCX | CSPAX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.99 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.239 | 9.632 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.3B | 326M | 25,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.65 | 8.04 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.75 | 32.61 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.87 | 9.27 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers