Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNNX
CSPAX vs GLNNX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNNX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$24.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
CSPAX vs GLNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. GLNNX (69.9M). GLNNX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: GLNNX (0.62) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNNX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNNX (13 years). GLNNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNNX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. GLNNX (3.49). GLNNX return over 5 years is better than : 9.03 vs. CSPAX (8.04).
| CSPAX | GLNNX | CSPAX / GLNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.01 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.46 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.797 | 8.122 | 133% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.9B | 69.9M | 115,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.62 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 3.49 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 43.69 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | 9.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.47 | 67.94 | 90% |