Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNMX
CSPAX vs GLNMX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNMX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
MFS Global New Discovery R4
Price$25.29
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.94M
CSPAX vs GLNMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNMX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNMX (71.9M). CSPAX (0.58) and GLNMX (0.57) have matching dividends . CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNMX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNMX (14 years). GLNMX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNMX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.45 vs. GLNMX (10.19). GLNMX return over 5 years is better than : 17.16 vs. CSPAX (15.23).
| CSPAX | GLNMX | CSPAX / GLNMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.10 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.922 | 11.101 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3B | 71.9M | 111,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.57 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.45 | 10.19 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.70 | 24.70 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.23 | 17.16 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.51 | 63.56 | 79% |