Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNLX
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNLX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.94M
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNLX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNLX (71.9M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: CSPAX (0.58) vs GLNLX (0.36). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNLX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNLX (14 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNLX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.45 vs. GLNLX (9.91). GLNLX (15.47) and CSPAX (15.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSPAX | GLNLX | CSPAX / GLNLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.35 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.81 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.922 | 10.971 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3B | 71.9M | 111,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.36 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.45 | 9.91 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.70 | 23.75 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.23 | 15.47 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.51 | 59.02 | 86% |