Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNLX
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNLX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.19
Change+$0.79 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.06
Change+$0.17 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNLX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. GLNLX (69.9M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNLX (0.35). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNLX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNLX (14 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNLX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.55 vs. GLNLX (3.75). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.41 vs. GLNLX (8.12).
| CSPAX | GLNLX | CSPAX / GLNLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.35 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.81 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.990 | 8.623 | 139% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.9B | 69.9M | 115,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.35 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.55 | 3.75 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.97 | 43.94 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.41 | 8.12 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.44 | 62.33 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement