Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.44
Change+$1.43 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
MFS Global New Discovery R2
Price$23.62
Change+$0.24 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.77M
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNKX (68.8M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.67) vs GLNKX (0.17). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (14 years). GLNKX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.19 vs. GLNKX (7.95). GLNKX return over 5 years is better than : 0.92 vs. CSPAX (-7.69).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.60 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.01 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.763 | 4.467 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4B | 68.8M | 119,767% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.19 | 7.95 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 20.41 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.69 | 0.92 | -836% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.16 | 79.47 | 130% |