Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.1B
MFS Global New Discovery R2
Price$23.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. GLNKX (69.9M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNKX (0.13). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (14 years). GLNKX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. GLNKX (2.87). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.04 vs. GLNKX (5.31).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.60 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.06 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.797 | 7.610 | 142% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.1B | 69.9M | 116,023% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.13 | 424% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 2.87 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 41.10 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | 5.31 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.47 | 57.22 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement