Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNKX
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNKX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
MFS Global New Discovery R2
Price$23.72
Change+$0.21 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.36M
CSPAX vs GLNKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNKX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and GLNKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. GLNKX (72.4M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNKX (0.13). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNKX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNKX (14 years). GLNKX (2.06) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNKX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. GLNKX (8.03). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.56 vs. GLNKX (15.56).
| CSPAX | GLNKX | CSPAX / GLNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.60 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.06 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.673 | 11.298 | 103% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 72.4M | 112,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.13 | 427% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 8.03 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.70 | 38.24 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | 15.56 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.97 | 63.72 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement