Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNIX
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.44
Change+$1.43 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$25.18
Change+$0.22 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.83M
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNIX (69.8M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: CSPAX (0.67) vs GLNIX (0.59). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNIX (14 years). GLNIX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNIX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.19 vs. GLNIX (8.64). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.90 vs. CSPAX (-7.69).
| CSPAX | GLNIX | CSPAX / GLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.10 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.51 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.763 | 4.525 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4B | 69.8M | 118,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.59 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.19 | 8.64 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 22.40 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.69 | 3.90 | -197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.16 | 90.73 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement