Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNIX
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$25.28
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.94M
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNIX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNIX (71.9M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: CSPAX (0.58) vs GLNIX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNIX (14 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNIX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. GLNIX (8.95). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.97 vs. CSPAX (14.95).
| CSPAX | GLNIX | CSPAX / GLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.10 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.650 | 10.975 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3B | 71.9M | 111,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.55 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 8.95 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 24.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.95 | 16.97 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.82 | 63.51 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers