Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNIX
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$25.17
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.43M
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNIX (73.4M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: CSPAX (0.70) vs GLNIX (0.61). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNIX (14 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNIX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. GLNIX (12.00). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.80 vs. CSPAX (-5.07).
| CSPAX | GLNIX | CSPAX / GLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.10 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.194 | 4.483 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4B | 73.4M | 112,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.61 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 12.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.35 | 26.80 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.07 | 4.80 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.97 | 89.66 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement