Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNCX
CSPAX vs GLNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$72.64
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.89
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.94M
CSPAX vs GLNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNCX (71.9M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: CSPAX (0.58) vs GLNCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNCX (14 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: CSPAX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.22 vs. GLNCX (7.89). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.95 vs. GLNCX (10.11).
| CSPAX | GLNCX | CSPAX / GLNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.56 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.650 | 10.333 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.3B | 71.9M | 111,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 7.89 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.60 | 21.07 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.95 | 10.11 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.82 | 44.97 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers