Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNCX
CSPAX vs GLNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.77
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.43M
CSPAX vs GLNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNCX (73.4M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: CSPAX (0.70) vs GLNCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNCX (14 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: CSPAX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. GLNCX (10.56). GLNCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.27 vs. CSPAX (-5.07).
| CSPAX | GLNCX | CSPAX / GLNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.56 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.194 | 4.412 | 95% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4B | 73.4M | 112,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 10.56 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.35 | 22.72 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.07 | -1.27 | 399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.97 | 67.46 | 147% |