Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNBX
CSPAX vs GLNBX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNBX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.90
Change+$0.19 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.1M
CSPAX vs GLNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and GLNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNBX (72.1M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNBX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNBX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNBX (14 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: CSPAX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. GLNBX (7.52). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.56 vs. GLNBX (12.07).
| CSPAX | GLNBX | CSPAX / GLNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.56 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.673 | 10.938 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 72.1M | 112,067% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 7.52 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.70 | 36.20 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | 12.07 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.97 | 53.81 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement