Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNBX
CSPAX vs GLNBX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNBX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.44
Change+$1.43 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.77
Change+$0.20 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.77M
CSPAX vs GLNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNBX (68.8M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: CSPAX (0.67) vs GLNBX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNBX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNBX (14 years). GLNBX (2.51) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: CSPAX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.19 vs. GLNBX (7.24). GLNBX return over 5 years is better than : -2.11 vs. CSPAX (-7.69).
| CSPAX | GLNBX | CSPAX / GLNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.51 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.763 | 4.412 | 108% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4B | 68.8M | 119,767% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.19 | 7.24 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 18.44 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.69 | -2.11 | 364% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.16 | 68.24 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement