Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNBX
CSPAX vs GLNBX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNBX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.19
Change+$0.79 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.42
Change+$0.15 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
CSPAX vs GLNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. GLNBX (69.9M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNBX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNBX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNBX (14 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: CSPAX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. GLNBX (2.36). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.04 vs. GLNBX (2.11).
| CSPAX | GLNBX | CSPAX / GLNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.56 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.797 | 7.208 | 150% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.9B | 69.9M | 115,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 2.36 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 39.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | 2.11 | 381% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.47 | 47.71 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement