Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNAX
CSPAX vs GLNAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNAX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$75.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.43M
CSPAX vs GLNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNAX (73.4M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: CSPAX (0.70) vs GLNAX (0.37). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNAX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNAX (14 years). GLNAX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GLNAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: CSPAX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. GLNAX (11.73). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.38 vs. CSPAX (-5.07).
| CSPAX | GLNAX | CSPAX / GLNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.35 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.81 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.194 | 4.480 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4B | 73.4M | 112,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.37 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 11.73 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.35 | 25.85 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.07 | 3.38 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.97 | 84.24 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers