Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs FBOGX
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs FBOGX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$9.83
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets792.66M
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. FBOGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and FBOGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. FBOGX (793M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: FBOGX (1.39) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than FBOGX: CSPAX (24 years) vs FBOGX (12 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: CSPAX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. FBOGX (-3.43). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.04 vs. FBOGX (5.30).
| CSPAX | FBOGX | CSPAX / FBOGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.797 | 3.692 | 292% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.9B | 793M | 10,202% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.39 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | -3.43 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 31.26 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.04 | 5.30 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.47 | 22.78 | 270% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement