Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs FBOGX
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs FBOGX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.27
Change+$0.29 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
Templeton Global Smaller Comp R6
Price$10.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.76M
CSPAX vs FBOGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. FBOGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and FBOGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. FBOGX (836M). FBOGX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: FBOGX (1.38) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than FBOGX: CSPAX (24 years) vs FBOGX (12 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FBOGX (0.96). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FBOGX (11.95). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBOGX: CSPAX (250) vs FBOGX (1000000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.60 vs. FBOGX (4.65). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.30 vs. FBOGX (15.68).
| CSPAX | FBOGX | CSPAX / FBOGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.111 | 8.017 | 151% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 836M | 9,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.38 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.60 | 4.65 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.41 | 25.51 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.30 | 15.68 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.08 | 30.07 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement