Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMMX vs GFAFX
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMMX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$80.87
Change-$0.86 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
CSMMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMMX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CSMMX (3.59B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CSMMX: GFAFX (0.22) vs CSMMX (0.00). CSMMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CSMMX (20 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). CSMMX (1.73) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). CSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMMX: GFAFX (250) vs CSMMX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. CSMMX (-7.83). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.50 vs. CSMMX (-17.29).
| CSMMX | GFAFX | CSMMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.65 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.65 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.738 | 1.570 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.59B | 336B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.83 | 9.57 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.49 | 56.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.29 | 20.50 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.15 | 121.12 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers