Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMDX vs NAESX
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CSMDX vs NAESX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
Price$16.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.71M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.59
Change+$0.15 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. CSMDX (174M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CSMDX: NAESX (1.20) vs CSMDX (0.52). CSMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CSMDX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CSMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMDX: NAESX (3000) vs CSMDX (5000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. CSMDX (2.29). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.60 vs. CSMDX (39.90).
| CSMDX | NAESX | CSMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.157 | 6.494 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.20 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.29 | 13.62 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.95 | 39.23 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.90 | 66.60 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement