Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMDX vs NAESX
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CSMDX vs NAESX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
Price$15.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.89M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMDX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. CSMDX (206M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CSMDX: NAESX (1.28) vs CSMDX (0.55). CSMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CSMDX (8 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CSMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMDX: NAESX (3000) vs CSMDX (5000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. CSMDX (3.59). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. CSMDX (42.09).
| CSMDX | NAESX | CSMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.133 | 1.432 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.28 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.59 | 12.22 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.34 | 37.83 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.09 | 69.32 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement