Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMDX vs NAESX
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CSMDX vs NAESX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
Price$15.63
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.98M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. CSMDX (163M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CSMDX: NAESX (1.23) vs CSMDX (0.54). CSMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CSMDX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CSMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMDX: NAESX (3000) vs CSMDX (5000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.92 vs. CSMDX (-5.59). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 55.28 vs. CSMDX (30.17).
| CSMDX | NAESX | CSMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.024 | 5.577 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.23 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.59 | 4.92 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.29 | 41.91 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.17 | 55.28 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 130.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement