Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMDX vs FTHFX
CSMDX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMDX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
Price$16.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.71M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.27B
CSMDX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMDX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMDX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. CSMDX (174M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSMDX: FTHFX (0.70) vs CSMDX (0.52). CSMDX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSMDX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CSMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSMDX (24.00). CSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSMDX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.53 vs. CSMDX (2.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.71 vs. CSMDX (39.90).
| CSMDX | FTHFX | CSMDX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.63 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.63 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.157 | 10.502 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 11.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.70 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.29 | 8.53 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.95 | 56.33 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.90 | 103.71 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 178.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers