Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMDX vs FTHFX
CSMDX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSMDX vs FTHFX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
Price$15.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.02M
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$51.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.13B
CSMDX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMDX vs. FTHFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMDX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. CSMDX (164M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than CSMDX: FTHFX (0.69) vs CSMDX (0.53). CSMDX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSMDX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). CSMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CSMDX (24.00). CSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: CSMDX (5000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. CSMDX (0.45). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 76.22 vs. CSMDX (17.58).
| CSMDX | FTHFX | CSMDX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.63 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.63 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.436 | 14.113 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 11.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.69 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.45 | 12.53 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.03 | 50.85 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.58 | 76.22 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 227.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers