Advertisement
CSMD vs RMBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMD is a Hold and RMBS is a Hold.
RMBS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CSMD | RMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HISFX | 15.24 | 0.25 | +1.67% |
| Hennessy Small Cap Financial Instl | |||
| TCRAX | 61.62 | 0.27 | +0.44% |
| American Century Growth A | |||
| PURRX | 20.83 | 0.06 | +0.29% |
| PGIM Global Real Estate R | |||
| MNMIX | 15.08 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term I | |||
| SIDVX | 13.29 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val A | |||
CSMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSMD has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSMD jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSMD | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| LECO - CSMD | 73% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| RMBS - CSMD | 72% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| ENTG - CSMD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| NVT - CSMD | 71% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| WHD - CSMD | 69% Closely correlated | +2.81% | ||
More | ||||
RMBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMBS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RMBS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBS | 100% | -1.93% | ||
| LRCX - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| AMKR - RMBS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KLIC - RMBS | 76% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| VECO - RMBS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| KLAC - RMBS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||