CSLUF
Price
$11.59
Change
+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
TLGUF
Price
$16.50
Change
+$1.51 (+10.07%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLUF vs TLGUF

Header iconCSLUF vs TLGUF Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs TLGUFBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.59
Change+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Volume$1.06K
CapitalizationN/A
TLGY Acquisition
Price$16.50
Change+$1.51 (+10.07%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CSLUF vs TLGUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. TLGUF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a Hold and TLGUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $11.59 vs. TLGUF: $16.50)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and TLGUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 97% vs. TLGUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. TLGUF: $0
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. TLGUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLGUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLGUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLGUF is a better buy in the long-term than CSLUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLUF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLGUF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TLGUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLUF and TLGUF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TLGUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +10.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TLGUF YTD gains are higher at: 33.172 vs. CSLUF (-0.855). CSLUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. TLGUF (-1.73M). CSLUF has more cash in the bank: 174K vs. TLGUF (40.6K). CSLUF has less debt than TLGUF: CSLUF (600K) vs TLGUF (1.29M). CSLUF (0) and TLGUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLUFTLGUFCSLUF / TLGUF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDA-1.14M-1.73M66%
Gain YTD-0.85533.172-3%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K40.6K429%
Total Debt600K1.29M46%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUFTLGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOOP1.360.10
+7.94%
Loop Industries
LPLA380.043.25
+0.86%
LPL Financial Holdings
LTH29.220.13
+0.45%
Life Time Group Holdings
OTRK0.58N/A
+0.36%
Ontrak Inc
PFLT10.71N/A
N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSLUF has been loosely correlated with CRTUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSLUF jumps, then CRTUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
N/A
CRTUF - CSLUF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLGUF - CSLUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRLU - CSLUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMCGU - CSLUF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTAF - CSLUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TLGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLGUF has been loosely correlated with ISRLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLGUF jumps, then ISRLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLGUF
1D Price
Change %
TLGUF100%
N/A
ISRLU - TLGUF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLUF - TLGUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EONR - TLGUF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
TREE - TLGUF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
SVIIU - TLGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More