CSLMF
Price
$14.00
Change
+$1.00 (+7.69%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
79.04M
SVIIU
Price
$13.00
Change
-$1.17 (-8.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs SVIIU

Header iconCSLMF vs SVIIU Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs SVIIUBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$14.00
Change+$1.00 (+7.69%)
Volume$157
Capitalization79.04M
Spring Valley Acquisition
Price$13.00
Change-$1.17 (-8.26%)
Volume$123
CapitalizationN/A
CSLMF vs SVIIU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVIIU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. SVIIU commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and SVIIU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $14.00 vs. SVIIU: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and SVIIU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 0% vs. SVIIU: 36%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $79.04M vs. SVIIU: $0
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $79.04M. SVIIU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $174.23M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVIIU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVIIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLMF and SVIIU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVIIU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SVIIU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVIIU is a better buy in the short-term than CSLMF.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVIIU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +6.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.64% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSLMF YTD gains are higher at: 21.739 vs. SVIIU (14.943). SVIIU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -727.09K vs. CSLMF (-2.53M). SVIIU has more cash in the bank: 158K vs. CSLMF (14K). SVIIU has less debt than CSLMF: SVIIU (1.5M) vs CSLMF (3.36M). CSLMF (0) and SVIIU (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFSVIIUCSLMF / SVIIU
Capitalization79MN/A-
EBITDA-2.53M-727.09K349%
Gain YTD21.73914.943145%
P/E Ratio353.50N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14K158K9%
Total Debt3.36M1.5M224%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMFSVIIU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVIIU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIQUF205.252.00
+0.98%
L'Air Liquide SA
SHBBF80.930.48
+0.59%
SPECIALTY HOLDCO BELGIUM BV
TAOFF4.25N/A
N/A
IPERIONX LTD.
OMHLF0.17N/A
N/A
OM Holdings Ltd.
RMTO0.14N/A
N/A
RM2 International, Inc.

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WELNF - CSLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLUF - CSLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTAF - CSLMF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
SVIIU - CSLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
-8.26%
More

SVIIU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVIIU has been loosely correlated with SVII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVIIU jumps, then SVII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVIIU
1D Price
Change %
SVIIU100%
-8.26%
SVII - SVIIU
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
ALSUF - SVIIU
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVACU - SVIIU
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.99%
VCICU - SVIIU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGUF - SVIIU
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More