CSLMF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
19.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSSUF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs MSSUF

Header iconCSLMF vs MSSUF Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs MSSUFBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$85.9K
Capitalization19.2M
Metal Sky Star Acquisition
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$198
CapitalizationN/A
CSLMF vs MSSUF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. MSSUF commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and MSSUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $3.40 vs. MSSUF: $10.05)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and MSSUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 104% vs. MSSUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $19.2M vs. MSSUF: $0
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $19.2M. MSSUF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $176.05M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSSUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSSUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLMF and MSSUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MSSUF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+3.46% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSSUF YTD gains are higher at: -14.758 vs. CSLMF (-70.435). MSSUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -653.02K vs. CSLMF (-2.53M). MSSUF has less debt than CSLMF: MSSUF (3.12M) vs CSLMF (3.36M). CSLMF (0) and MSSUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFMSSUFCSLMF / MSSUF
Capitalization19.2MN/A-
EBITDA-2.53M-653.02K388%
Gain YTD-70.435-14.758477%
P/E Ratio85.85N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14KN/A-
Total Debt3.36M3.12M108%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMFMSSUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TROY.X0.0000750.000004
+5.38%
TROY cryptocurrency
APE.X0.2014880.003207
+1.62%
ApeCoin cryptocurrency
WBTC.X87486.266000255.265620
+0.29%
Wrapped Bitcoin cryptocurrency
MBOX.X0.029958-0.000155
-0.51%
MOBOX cryptocurrency
LSK.X0.199386-0.003111
-1.54%
Lisk cryptocurrency

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and VMCAF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and VMCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
VMCAF - CSLMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HONDU - CSLMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXAI - CSLMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
ESHA - CSLMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
MSSUF - CSLMF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSSUF has been loosely correlated with RRACF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSSUF jumps, then RRACF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSSUF
1D Price
Change %
MSSUF100%
N/A
RRACF - MSSUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AIMTF - MSSUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSAF - MSSUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMCU - MSSUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WELNF - MSSUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More