CSLMF
Price
$11.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
105.06M
IX
Price
$23.09
Change
-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
26.23B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs IX

Header iconCSLMF vs IX Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs IXBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization105.06M
Orix
Price$23.09
Change-$0.09 (-0.39%)
Volume$81.09K
Capitalization26.23B
CSLMF vs IX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. IX commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and IX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $11.55 vs. IX: $23.09)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and IX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 5% vs. IX: 42%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $105.06M vs. IX: $26.23B
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $105.06M. IX’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $26.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IX is a better buy in the long-term than CSLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IX is a better buy in the short-term than CSLMF.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -3.75% price change this week, while IX (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +3.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

IX is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.43% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IX($26.2B) has a higher market cap than CSLMF($105M). CSLMF has higher P/E ratio than IX: CSLMF (16.93) vs IX (11.00). IX YTD gains are higher at: 8.679 vs. CSLMF (0.435). CSLMF has less debt than IX: CSLMF (600K) vs IX (6.51T). IX has higher revenues than CSLMF: IX (1.88T) vs CSLMF (0).
CSLMFIXCSLMF / IX
Capitalization105M26.2B0%
EBITDA-1.14MN/A-
Gain YTD0.4358.6795%
P/E Ratio16.9311.00154%
Revenue01.88T-
Total Cash174KN/A-
Total Debt600K6.51T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IX: Fundamental Ratings
IX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMFIX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
1%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXBUX9.410.09
+0.97%
Empower S&P Mid Cap 400® Index L
NMIAX28.940.14
+0.49%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
VVONX22.930.10
+0.44%
Invesco Value Opportunities R5
LIAGX16.300.01
+0.06%
Lord Abbett International Growth I
MCGRX17.25-0.01
-0.06%
BlackRock Natural Resources Inv C

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
WELNF - CSLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLUF - CSLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRTAF - CSLMF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IX - CSLMF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More

IX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IX has been loosely correlated with VOYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IX jumps, then VOYA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IX
1D Price
Change %
IX100%
-0.39%
VOYA - IX
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HTH - IX
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
FRHC - IX
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
TREE - IX
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
HAIUF - IX
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More