Advertisement
CSLMF vs CXAI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a StrongBuy and CXAI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCXAI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CXAI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXAI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- CXAI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CXAI (@Packaged Software) price change was -30.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.03%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -5.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.53%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.96% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Packaged Software (-5.28% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CSLMF | CXAI | CSLMF / CXAI | |
| Capitalization | 19.2M | 8.5M | 226% |
| EBITDA | -2.53M | -3.13M | 81% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -31.325 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 85.85 | 0.83 | 10,314% |
| Revenue | 0 | 5.22M | - |
| Total Cash | 14K | 5.09M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 3.36M | 6.86M | 49% |
| CSLMF | CXAI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
CSLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HSPOF - CSLMF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| VMCAF - CSLMF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLMK - CSLMF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| HONDU - CSLMF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CXAI - CSLMF | 24% Poorly correlated | +7.29% | ||
More | ||||
CXAI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXAI has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXAI jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXAI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXAI | 100% | +7.29% | ||
| NOW - CXAI | 74% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| THRY - CXAI | 69% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| DUOL - CXAI | 67% Closely correlated | +4.43% | ||
| OTEX - CXAI | 66% Closely correlated | +10.00% | ||
| JTAI - CXAI | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
More | ||||